WHO'S UNPATRIOTIC? HMM..COULD IT BE THE WRITER?
In a op-ed piece by the ultra-leftst and liberal New York Times, Paul Krugmann comes up with mistaken military figures, as well as delves into people's personal failings to try to say Bush is unpatriotic.
First, Krugmann says that Bush's administration pressured people to cook the intelligence books. I guess even 12 years before his administration, he is so insidiously evil that he had operatives cooking the intelligence books stating that Iraq was an imminent danger to the United States. His insipid influence must have grasped Mr. Clinton's mind when Mr. Clinton talked about Iraq and weapons of Mass Destruction. I guess Mr. Bush is so megalomaniacal that he used his evil Jedi powers to influence the UN to send out 17 resolutions decrying Iraq for weapons. Wow, pretty smart manuevering for a dummy and dolt, eh? Oh, it must be Karl Rove, then, right?
Next, the author goes on to talk about the morale of our troops dissipating. Well, quite frankly, this is turning out to be like Vietnam, at least on the media front. The press is only reporting the bad, not the tremendous progress of new hospitals, new relationships, that come out of Iraq. No, let's report the troop deaths, in valor no less, and make a scandal of it. The media is eroding our troops' and country's morale. Just as they did for Vietnam. Rep. Jim Marshall, of Georgia, a DEMOCRAT, no less, said it himself. We are making tremendous progress, but the media is trying to spin this war as a loss.
Next, the author relies on the Brookings Institution as an objective source. The Brookings Institution is a liberal thinktank with no less than 100 former employees of the Clinton Administration in its members. Wow, great objectivity, there. The destruction of our military rests in the hands of the press, not the administration.
Finally, the author goes into some diatribe out silencing dissent. No one was upset when FDR silenced dissent in WWII. And, given all I hear out of the Democrat 10, all I hear is dissent. This is merely a smear piece based on little more than Democrat liberal theory and dogma. The author cites some cloak and dagger experience and people's personal lives, while saying "unnamed sources." I am sure these sources are fabrications, much like Hatfield's Bush book that was removed from shelves for inaccuracy, Fortunate Son.
The answer to the question, Mr. Letter Writer, is that it is you who are unpatriotic.
