Showing posts with label Sudan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sudan. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 01, 2008

Doesn't This Mean War?

AP News Alert:
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) A U.S. official says an American diplomat in Khartoum has died of injuries suffered in a shooting.
I thought that this meant war... I suspect that instead of that, we'll get what the State Department types call a "proportional response" which means we'll do essentially nothing and certainly nothing that would equal the taking of the life of one of our diplomats.

Now before the liberals start calling me a warmonger or worse, let me state that I don't think we should go to war with Sudan. I do think we ought to get to the bottom of who did this and then "bring them to justice." By which I do mean that we ought to kill whomever was responsibile.

Was it not true that all a citizen of Rome needed to do was proclaim that he was a civitas Romani (you Latin people feel free to correct my usage) and know that if he should be killed by a foreigner, that Rome would avenge his death with interest? It is that sort of power that our enemy would respect; but we dare not claim it, for whatever reason. Our enemy knows this...and is using it to his advantage.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

JMZ, a Union Kingpin, and Divestment of Iran

Previously on WMD, I posted a press release in which Teamsters kingpin Jimmy the Younger Hoffa calls for divestment in Iran.

Jill Miller Zimon (JMZ) of Writes Like She Talks has been a vocal opponent of Ohio's bill to do just that, so I called her out to get her view on this latest development. Jill responded in the comments with this:
Matt - Thanks for the shout-out. I received a copy of this statement sometime last week.
No problem at all, Jill...
This effort targets action at the federal level. Many folks who've written about the divestment efforts, including me, have stressed that if Rep. Mandel and Jones were congressional legislators, they would receive a great deal more support and have far more legitimacy to their push.
I fail to understand what the significance of where the Reps are currently serving makes on the argument that Americans/Ohioans ought not be supporting these regimes. I take it from this statement that your argument isn't with the idea of divesting in Iran and Sudan, but that it's the state of Ohio that is proposing to do it. Perhaps the Mandel/Jones Bill will put a spotlight on the issue and then Congress might pick it up...
Missouri's fund has been examined by the Wall Street Journal, among other entities. From what I've read, and I have not done independent research on it, the fund is extremely tiny and experimental.
I'd imagine it wouldn't take much to increase Sudan's value...
There are many social fund options out there, no question about it.
This is true...
But divestment from foreign nations is not for state legislatures to decide. It's a matter of foreign policy, to be decided at the level of the U.S. Congress.
If the State of Ohio is responsible for the money, then the state legislature is entirely within their rights to dictate where the money goes. If the situation were such where the federal government had imposed a divestment order and Ohio wanted to invest in these countries, then I would agree with you; but that is not the case here. Quite the opposite, in fact.

I think that "The Heart of It All" was a stupid slogan for Ohio, but it sure beats this: Let's do the socially responsible thing...until it's inconvenient...or a nuisance.

As always, I look forward to continued conversation...

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Darfur Update

AP News Alert:
WASHINGTON (AP) President Bush announced new sanctions Tuesday to pressure Sudan's government to halt the violence in Darfur.
I'm not a big fan of the sanctions game plan. Generally, sanctions hurt the citizens and not the people in power. I think these people have suffered enough.

Too bad Europe doesn't have any military might to go in and straighten this problem out...

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Stupid Republican Update

How embarrassing would it be to be a minor candidate for the Republican nomination for President of the United States and be the only vote against a resolution "calling on the League of Arab States to acknowledge the genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan and to step up their efforts to stop the genocide in Darfur"?

Ron Paul, call your office...

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Darfur Update

AP News Alert:
WASHINGTON (AP) President Bush says the United States will tighten economic sanctions on Sudan and impose new punishments if it fails to take concrete action to stop the bloodshed in Darfur.
I don't think economic sanctions are going to work...somebody is going to have to send in real troops (and not UN "peacekeepers").

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Legal War on Terror Update

AP News Alert:
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) A federal judge has ruled that Sudan is responsible for the terrorist bombing of the USS Cole that killed 17 sailors in 2000.
And what, exactly, does this mean? Will the US now sue Sudan? And what exactly are we looking for?