Monday, November 17, 2003

Generals On Clark...Not Good


When at a forum in September, retired Gen. Hugh Shelton was asked if he would support retired Gen. Wesley Clark for president, Shelton, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, quickly took a drink of water. "That question makes me wish it were vodka," Shelton said. "I've known Wes for a long time. I will tell you the reason he came out of Europe early had to do with integrity and character issues, things that are very near and dear to my heart. I'm not going to say whether I'm a Republican or a Democrat. I'll just say Wes won't get my vote."

Which was bad enough, but on November 6, retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf appeared on CNBC's Capital Report, hosted by Gloria Borger and Alan Murray, who asked him what he thought of Clark. "I think the greatest condemnation against him . . . came from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when he was a NATO commander. I mean, he was fired as a NATO commander," Schwarzkopf replied, "and when Hugh Shelton said he was fired because of matters of character and integrity, that is a very, very damning statement, which says, `If that's the case, he's not the right man for president,' as far as I'm concerned."


Get the rest of the former generals opinions from US News and World Report.

Matt's Chat

The Clintons and those who support them can't like this one bit! Wes is bad for our country. I'm amazed he made it as far as he did. It defies all logic...

Mark's Remarks

Wow, military men against an indecisive general who was fired for botching actions in Europe....What exactly was good about Wes's record again? These men worked with Gen. Clark, or shared the same brotherhood of the military....and they won't merely offer a no comment, but rather come out against him....hmm....they at least decided, unlike Wes who will waffle until asking his secretary Mary to come in and decide his stance for him, of course after close consultation with Slick Willie Clinton and Shrew Hill.