Thursday, December 04, 2008

Not All Is Happy In Pelosi's Paradise?

Democrats worried about how Her Bullwhipness will lead? Dems not sure if she is going to be too liberal or too conservative? What? I thought you lefties were one big happy group of people's liberators! Evidently, not so:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) moves since the November elections have shaken up some of her colleagues, with some looking over their shoulders and others worried about how the Speaker will lead her expanded majority in 2009.
But not all Democrats are celebrating. Liberals are worried about Pelosi’s vow to govern “from the middle” and centrists are concerned that the make-up of the House leadership team has shifted noticeably to the left.


Contrary to the jubilation of House Democrats after they regained control of the lower chamber after the 2006 elections, there is some unease among members heading into the 111th Congress.


“Everybody I talk to, everybody’s worried about something,” said a Democratic staffer.


Pelosi’s effort to make some Democrats anxious could be a calculated maneuver as she seeks to maximize the effectiveness of her caucus heading into 2009. Pelosi’s hard-charging tone and decisions over the past month have sent a message to her colleagues: Don’t get too comfortable.


The seniority system that tempers the power of the Speaker is teetering, having received a body blow from Rep. Henry Waxman’s (D-Calif.) coup at the Energy and Commerce Committee.


When chairmen aren’t flinching at the possibility of a challenge from a junior member, they can look forward to being bounced by term limits in four years. That’s a change that Pelosi quietly endorsed in the 2007 House rules package.


Throughout the past four years, there has been a palpable strain in the Democratic Caucus between the older members who extol the seniority system and younger legislators who believe they deserve a more significant role in decisionmaking.


Pelosi, the unquestioned leader in the House whose enormous power seems to grow by the day, has sought to placate both factions. And to this point, she has succeeded.


Few members clash publicly with Pelosi. Reps. John Dingell (D-Mich.) and Jane Harman (D-Calif.), who were at odds with Pelosi over the last few years, were stripped of their top committee posts.


Centrists are grumbling that their growing ranks aren’t represented in the leadership team that Pelosi shaped through back-room arm-twisting. The so-called Blue Dogs, while publicly celebrating President-elect Obama’s commitment to “pay-go,” are wondering when the stimulus balloon stops expanding.


There is also growing speculation that pay-go will be waived for healthcare legislation, which is expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars.


Meanwhile, Congress has swept in and out of town since the election with little to show except for a deposed chairman and a tongue-lashing for auto executives. And to the extent that any decisions are being announced, they’re coming from Obama’s headquarters in Chicago.


What, you thought the most exalted leader would let centrist Dems have a say? Silly you! The Messiah and his harbinger of hate Pelosi don't care what you think, as long as you kowtow when appropriate. Just try, try and wander off the reservation.

Pelosi is such a diva anyway. This is a woman who, at tax payer expense, has her security detail stop for Haagen Daas every day on their way to pick her up; and everyday she gets a hair styling that costs no less than 75 dollars.....AT YOUR EXPENSE....How do I know this? A snotty nosed jr. lobbyist for the AARP told me about it over a BBQ at a mutual friend's place. His excuse for the majesterial excess? She works hard and she deserves it....

FOR WHAT? Naming some post offices....approving a never ending bailout? Undermining American security?