Wednesday, August 05, 2009

Buckeye Institute Weighs in On Obamacare

...and they find it stinks, too....They also propose actually moving toward a free market healthcare system, instead of the current facade we have now:
One of the biggest misconceptions in the current debate over health care reform is that somehow our nation has a free market health care system. In fact, government already pays for around half of the health care spending in our country. At both the federal and state level, government imposes heavy regulations on the industry. What drives both this spending and these regulations is not a search for quality patient care or efficient medical spending. Instead, the pressure to please interest groups is what has largely shaped the government's role in health care. This won't change if President Obama gets his way and establishes a huge new government health insurance system.

Even a cursory look at Medicare, Medicaid, and the regulation of health insurance will illustrate this. Take Medicare. For over forty years, the federal government paid doctors when they performed medical errors. Instead of penalizing doctors when they did a bad job, Medicare rewarded them. Only in 2008 did the federal government take steps to stop this practice. Why did it take so long? The doctors' lobby is strong in Washington, D.C., and doctors will fight any efforts to reduce their payment, even if that payment is for a botched procedure.

Another example of the shaping of health care policy in order to benefit special interests is states' demand that health care providers obtain a "certificate of need" from the state before opening a new facility. In Ohio, if a long-term care provider wishes to open a new facility, it must go through a process where the state considers "the impact of the project on all other providers of similar services" in the area, as well as its "financial impact" on other providers. Essentially, this certificate can only be obtained if the new provider won't hurt long-term care facilities that already exist. That lack of competition is bad for patients but good for the established health care providers.

Look at those statements above I highlighted in bold....UNBELIEVABLE! But wait, Buckeye has more:
These companies are not going to sit idly by while politicians write rules that affect them. They are going to be actively engaged in the process, ensuring that any laws that are written will protect them and their profits.

We already see this in the health care legislation moving through Congress. The pharmaceutical industry has pledged its support for health care reform. Perhaps not coincidentally, Senate legislation made it more difficult for generic drugs to make it to market.

Health care "reform" that emerges from Washington, D.C., isn't going to be real reform. It's going to be legislation that inserts politics even more firmly into your health care. Given how poorly Congress has managed the current health care programs (or the budget, or the economy or any number of other things), you will likely be getting the health care that lobbyists want you to have, not the health care you desire.

We need less government control and interference, not more.