Friday, October 10, 2003

Dems Take Aim at Clark And Bush


Democratic presidential hopefuls turned up the heat on Wesley Clark in a campaign debate Thursday, calling the retired general and NATO commander -- who currently leads in some national polls -- a belated convert to their party and indecisive to boot.

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Sens. John Kerry, Joe Lieberman and John Edwards took turns criticizing Clark, saying he was speaking warmly of Mr. Bush as recently as 2001, and more recently switched positions to oppose the war with Iraq.


Get the rest of this story from CBS.

Matt's Chat

At last, we are finally seeing these guys snipe each other some. I was beginning to wonder if these folks forgot that only one of them can get the nomination. I do have a few specific items from this article that I want to address.

Former Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley Braun agreed that help from the United Nations as well as NATO is necessary, but said the United States has an obligation to rebuild Iraq since it waged war there. Senator, while assistance from either of these organizations would be more than welcome, it most definately is NOT neccessary or required.

Rev. Al Sharpton said Mr. Bush needs to admit he made a mistake in attacking Iraq without U.N. support. "The president went to the U.N. and said, "Help us on my terms.' If I were president, I would go in and say, 'We were wrong,'" he said. Reverand, the UN won't help us if we claim responsibility for all the evil in the world. It doesn't have anything to do with President Bush, it has to do with our way of life. By the way, how do you expect to be president with that whole seperation of church and state thing that the Democrats and the ACLU seem to throw at us all the time?

I could keep going, by why bother...

Mark's Remarks

Indeed.....maybe the Democrat motto should be: "We have no new ideas, so we will hate and demonize our opponents..." After all, that worked so good for them in Kaleeeforneeeeaaaa...didn't it? The liberals and democrats have no ideas, they have only hate....where is the great plan for improving things with Iraq? Should we elect Nikita Dean, who will pull us out and cause an even worse situation for the folks in Iraq? Should we elect the French-looking Jean Kerry(note the spelling, ehehe), who would place the UN in the leading role, after the great job they did in standing up to Saddam for 12 years? Or do we place Al Sharpton, who couldn't spell Iraq if you spotted him the Ira_? Then there is Dick Gephardt, who still thinks it is 1980 and he has a chance. Get..out..Dick!!!! This party is bereft of ideas, they see that things are starting to improve...so what do they have? They have to dig up non-scandals (read: SPY GAMES) and only report the bad news from Iraq. They have accomplices in the liberal media who help them, under the guise of "hard hitting reporting." What about reporting about how women can wear what they want, and they don't have to fear rape from Saddam's sons? No, that would be too positive, wouldn't it? Folks, if you want the world to get worse, vote for one of these nine nincompoops. They will send America spiralling back to the days of malaise and apathy in this country. I suppose it could be worse....Hillary could be running........