Legal War on Terror Update

AP News Alert:

(AP) According to their indictment, Hezam Ali Hassan, then 17, and Khaled Saleh, who was 18, followed the car of Ambassador Edmund Hull through the Sabeen area of San'a in 2003. Hassan - armed with a pistol and two hand grenades - climbed the wall of a store Hull had entered, the indictment said. Guards apprehended him before he could throw the grenades, it said. Their arrests were announced in 2004. In March 2006, the two men were sentenced to five years in prison, but an appeals court later reduced the penalty to three years - citing the defendants' ages as a reason for leniency. The appeals court upheld the decision Monday, and ordered the men released because they had served that time. The judge, Mohammed al-Hukaimi, also said the men deserved to be freed because their plot was never carried out. %) Yemeni Court Orders Release of 2 Men Convicted of Trying to Kill Former US Ambassador

My favorite part is where the judge says that they deserve to be let out because the plot wasn't carried out... It is precisely this sort of thinking that makes the court system -- any court system -- a ridiculous choice of "weapon" in the war on terror.