Thursday, October 09, 2003

Syria Cries About US House of Reps Vote


State Department spokesman Richard Boucher, responding to Syrian statements Thursday, said: "We don't think it's unreasonable or arrogant" to ask Syria "to stop support for terrorism, to stop support for groups whose goal is to kill people and disrupt the process of bringing peace to the region."

The measure itself will not have much economic impact on Syria. Diplomats estimate U.S.-Syrian trade at $300 million a year, and Syria is already under several U.S. restrictions because Washington considers it a state sponsor of terrorism.

But Wednesday's vote is meant to isolate Syria and more painful U.S. measures could follow, a Western diplomat said.

The Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act gives President Bush the right to impose a variety of sanctions on Syria, and accuses Syria of sponsoring terrorists, seeking weapons of mass destruction and occupying Lebanon with more than 20,000 troops.


Get the full story from the Associated Press.

Matt's Chat

No, it isn't too much to ask Syria to stop supporting terrorism. And it is about time that our government get involved in making sure that they do... Sanctions alone probably won't do it, but it is a crucial first step.

Mark's Remarks

I could not agree more. Syria has always been two-faced in dealing with us. This country has proven to be a safe haven for terrorists, for weapons of mass destruction (no, not matt and me, silly), and in financing terrorists. We need to show and put the world on notice, and carry through the Bush Doctrine...It is either freedom and peace, or if you support terrorism, pain and trouble.