Sunday, May 30, 2004

Terror Alert Retracted


From the Washington Times (UPI):
The FBI issued an urgent terror alert to several cities Friday, warning of the prospect of an imminent terrorist attack, but then retracted it hours later.

The New York Times reported Saturday FBI officials decided to retract the warning after their intelligence proved unfounded.

Matt's Chat

Watch the liberals move the goal post on this too... Remember when they were crying about not getting information out the people who needed it? Well, this time information was sent and it turned out to be wrong. Will the Partisan Mediatm berate the FBI for doing what was demanded of them? Or will they laregely ignore the story altogether? Personally, I think it was the right thing to do considering the time frame.

Rolling Thunder Supports Bush


From the Washington Times (UPI):
The veteran group Rolling Thunder rides into Washington this weekend aloft their trademark motorcycles for three days of events honoring their fellow veterans and strengthening ties with President Bush, their choice for November's election.

Rolling Thunder endorsed Bush over Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., a Vietnam veteran who travels widely with his "band of brothers," even though there are widespread allegations that the president shirked his duty during the conflict. And their choice may reflect a larger trend among the veteran community.

A Gallup Poll found that, in an almost inverse of the population at large, veterans prefer Bush over Kerry 50 percent to 41 percent.

Matt's Chat

Two things to point out here: 1) UPI is still trying to float the Texas Air National Guard non-story that has been proven false so many times, I can't believe professionals are still trying to use it. 2) Mr. Kerry has been trying to pass himself off as the choice for veterens, but it seems clear that his message isn't being received by, you know, veterens.

Saturday, May 29, 2004

Book Review: Against All Enemies by Richard Clarke


By Matt Hurley for the TIB Network



Against All Enemies is the book by Richard Clarke that explores the world of counterterrorism and his role in the field. Clarke had a long career of government service in the State Department and national security and was a key player in the Senior Executive Service for several administrations.

The book’s title is a reference to a line in the oath that all government types take to protect the Constitution against all enemies. There is veiled suggestion that the Bush 43 administration is somehow a threat to the Constitution and thus the nation; which is not only ridiculous, but absurd. Clarke narrates a tale of terrorism and terrorists and those who seek to bring justice to those who bring harm upon the United States all the while feeding and fueling his own ego.

Dick Clarke knows everything and even though no one elected him to any office, he thinks he gets to make all the decisions. In the book, Clarke continually berates his superiors who don’t agree with him. When he overlooks something, it is no big deal (let’s call it some intricate nuance that slips under his radar); but when his superiors don’t have all the facts, Clarke deems them idiots. Clarke is a master of hindsight; frequently engaging in what I have come to call “No $#|+, Dick Tracy” moments where it seems so obvious to Clarke because he knows everything but can’t seem to convince anybody that he does.

It has been some time since I read Losing bin Laden by Richard Miniter, but I vividly recall that author citing Richard Clarke as a source for a number of items in his book. One of the key topics Miniter covers in his book is the number of occasions that Osama was offered to President Clinton. Miniter outlines at least four rejections from the Clinton White House, citing Mansoor Ijaz (then a major Clinton supporter, now a FOX News analyst) who worked to put the people in communication with each other. Clarke calls these offers and the rejections pure fantasy.

In the cinematic version of Tom Clancy’s Sum of All Fears, the President and his cabinet engage in a war game dealing with an exchange of weapons of mass destruction with a renegade Russian madman. The commentary track on the DVD is quite interesting, in it Mr. Clancy asserts that the principals would never be involved in such an exercise for fear of the resulting action taken might get leaked and thus tip off any enemy as to what we might do. In chapter seven of Against All Enemies, Clarke describes chairing a meeting with the principals (although President Clinton did not attend) in which he lays out a disaster; all for the point of illustrating that Dick Clarke knows all and nobody else has a plan. That is exactly the kind of information we don’t want our enemies to have; even if we now have a plan. He put that in a book that sold millions of copies. Later in the same chapter, Dick let’s us in on the secret that Osama bin Laden had taken out a “hit” on him. He admits that the threat was probably “bogus” but you can actually see his head expand through the lines on the page. And yet again, he put other people in jeopardy with this account. Apparently he had a meeting with an Arab friend in a public place and this Arab asked about his protection. Sure enough, Dick pointed the undercover Secret Service folks out to this guy and then writes about it in his tell-all book.

Clarke is right about one thing: Iran. Current events lead me to believe that when we’re done installing democracy in Iraq and call for “Next?” we are going to have two options: Iran and Syria.

Syria is a likely target, in my book, because I believe Saddam transferred a good deal of his weapons of mass destruction there. Recently, there was a foiled attempt to use weapons of mass destruction to attack Jordan by al Qaeda terrorists from Syria. A “silent war” has been waged near the Iraqi-Syrian border for quite some time now and it has been established that a significant number of foreign fighters in Iraq entered from Syria. The problem is that sources are now saying that Syria may have moved the weapons to the Golan. If true, that increases the potential for attacks on Israel with weapons of mass destruction and that opens a whole new can of something smelly.

Iran has long been considered a major source of terrorism and terrorist funding. Clarke lays out the whole history and makes an excellent case for why they should be next. In fact, Clarke seems to question why the Bush administration chose Iraq over Iran as its first Middle East target in the War on Terror. I think Clarke understands the national security aspects and the international implications of counter-terrorism, but what he doesn’t get is the domestic politics of such decisions. Iraq was a known enemy. And Saddam was someone Americans could easily recognize. We had just spent the last two years learning about Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, whom the American people knew very little about.

Furthermore, choosing Iraq over Iran makes geopolitical sense: Iraq is at the heart of the Middle East. Securing Iraq first presents us with the options of being able to go to Iran or Syria. Plus, exporting democracy from Iraq will be easier and spread much more quickly because of its location and significance.

Allow me a moment to bring John Kerry in to the discussion for a bit. Kerry goes on and on about fighting the War on Terror with an internationalist approach and how a multilateral force of diplomats and negotiators could contain the situation so we could all go back to singing campfire songs instead of actually ridding the world of evil. If the liberal pseudo-god President Bill Clinton and his trusty know-it-all aide, Dick Clarke, couldn’t convince the Taliban to give up Osama bin Laden and the senior al Qaeda leadership; what makes John Kerry think he could do better? Just asking…

The entire book is preface to its final chapters wherein Clarke lambastes the Bush administration for the war in Iraq. Throughout the preceding chapters you will find belittlement and invective indicating Clarke’s liberal bias. All of that culminates in the final chapters. Now, I’m not one of those people who think President Clinton stood by and did nothing about bin Laden and al Qaeda; however, I am one of those who conclude that President Clinton (and thus Clarke) failed to take sufficient action when opportunity presented itself.

I’m not going to say that Clarke doesn’t have any valid criticisms. I will say that his knowledge and experience in counterterrorism are legitimate credentials. The problem is that he has let personal political ideology and unbounded narcissism cloud his judgment and evaluation of recent events. He had been working in counterterrorism for ten years and was too personally invested in his personal crusade and agenda.

His lack of knowledge of the personalities in the Bush administration and his unwillingness to do what was needed in order to gain sufficient influence demonstrate that Clarke had become ineffectual as a crisis management resource. After eight years of dealing with the Clinton administration, Clarke expected nothing to change with this administration. He should have known better. Politics is politics and as an experienced member of the Washington DC elite, he should have known better.

My recommendation is to pass on this book. I sure wouldn’t purchase the book; maybe check it out at the library. Quite frankly, the only reason I bothered to read it at all is that my boss bought it and passed it around. If Clarke had managed to put aside his obvious political leanings and wrote a book that took an honest unbiased view of the condition of our crisis management apparatus, I would have recommended the book; but that really isn’t what this book is about.



News You Didn't Hear from the Partisan Mediatm This Week

From the New York Times via Atlantic Blog:
[No quote. It is an excellent posting by William Sjostrom.]

Matt's Chat

So let me get this straight: the Bush administration stops genocide, and I have to hear about it from Glenn Reynolds? This totally sucks (no offense Glenn, but I'd like to think that our media is better than this) and totally exposes the liberal bias of the "mainstream" media. If Gore had actually won in 2000 and he managed to do something like this it would be on the front page of the New York Times, not buried in the opionion pages. And I am supposed to believe there isn't a bias in what gets reported? Heh, as Glenn would say...

Kerry: Bush Rushed Off to War

From al-Reuters:
Democratic challenger John Kerry charged on Friday that President Bush undermined America's safety by having "rushed off to war" in Iraq without adequate help or "a plan to win the peace."

"I believe that the Bush administration -- and I say this carefully and thoughtfully ... made America less safe, not more safe, with their blustery arrogant foreign policy," Kerry said at town hall meeting with military veterans and family members.

"I believe our troops are in greater danger today, exposed to more gun fire and more mortar attacks and more ambushes than they had to be if we had done what common sense dictates ... which is to build alliances and share the responsibilities," Kerry said.

Kerry made the comments as he touted his proposed new national security strategy, unveiled the day before in Seattle, to forge a coordinated global alliance against terror and end what he has described as Bush's divisive bullying tactics.

Matt's Chat

For the love of -- Alright, folks, let's do this one more time. The Bush administration spent fourteen months trying to get the Unimportant Nobodies to enforce their own resolutions which they chose not to do because the UN and a number of other significant countries were on Saddams payroll with UNSCAM. Fourteen months is hardly "rushing" in my book.

The "plan to win the peace" argument is misstated. The Bush administration and the Pentagon appear to have had a plan, it just hasn't been successful yet. History will be the judge of the success or failure of Iraqi Freedom NOT the junior senator from Taxachusetts. One would think that an experienced veteren like John Kerry (who, I don't know if you've heard, was in Vietnam, by the way) would come to the conclusion that Iraqi Freedom was a failure after merely a year. By historical standards, the casualty rates are significantly low. I don't know about you, but I question whether or not he has the ability to lead our nation in a time of war if John Kerry can't see that we're winning at this point.

America is most definately more safe, Mr. Kerry, since taking this war to the enemy. As I've said elsewhere, I'd much rather have the fighting going on in Baghdad rather than Boston; in Fallujah rather than Fairfield, OH. Most Americans, I think, would agree that we are in fact safer for that very reason. Thinking that Spetember 11th was it for al Qaeda is naive. Had we done nothing (which is what a Gore administration would have done), the attacks would have continued.

"Blustery arrogant foreign policy" is an interesting way to put it. I call it putting American interests first. Again, America was attacked in a very horrible and brutal fashion. It was important that America strike back. And not just at al Qaeda but at the root of the evil: Islamofascism. Al Qaeda isn't a nation-state; you can't point to it on a map. It was neccessary to make this be about something more than simple retribution, which is exactly why containment (Kerry's preferred strategy, I'm sure) was not going to work. How can you contain something that is all over the world already? The only option available to the President was to form a coalition of nations willing to take the fight to the enemy for the sake of all mankind. This is bigger than just America. It has been from the very beginning.

If the troops are in greater danger today, just think of how much danger they'd be in if that $87 billion aid package that John Kerry voted for before he voted against it hadn't passed. Kerry himself said a vote against that would be "reckless and irresponsible." Apparently, by Kerry's own admission, he is reckless and irresponsible. Is this who you want for Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces? The guy politicized this issue with his "protest vote." That's not what I want in the White House when a crisis is at hand: a man who will be too busy making his point showered in nuance while our troops need his support.

Mr. Kerry would have us believe that the President took us to war with no allies. That is 100% not true. The Coalition of the Willing includes: Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan. That looks pretty multilateral and internationalist to me. There are plenty of responsibilities being shared. Make no mistake, this is mainly our effort; we retain the leadership role and with that comes a number of responsibilities among them being a significant portion of the troops and material. Would it make sense to give France the command and control over our troops in this conflict? John Kerry is long known for wanting to give control of our military to the Unimportant Nobodies. Is that what you want for America? How do you think Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom and Uzbekistan feels when they hear this kind of nonsense coming from a guy who has even a remote chance of being the next President of the United States:
"If it is worth for the United States of America to be there to fight the war on terror, it is worth other countries being there as well," Kerry said to sustained applause.
Talk about blustery arrogance...

- Matt


Tillman Killed by Friendly Fire

From AZ Central.com:
Pat Tillman, the former Arizona Cardinals football player who died in April while a U.S. soldier fighting in Afghanistan, likely was killed by friendly fire, an Army investigation has concluded.
...
"It does seem pretty clear that he was killed by friendly fire," said Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, which was alerted to the information by the Army's Legislative Liaison Office.

"This does not take away one iota from the heroic nature and courage of the man. The source of that fire is of little consequence in terms of heroism," Franks said. He said that after learning of the Army's conclusions, he made some follow-up inquiries and was satisfied the information was accurate.

Friendly-fire accidents are an inevitable part of warfare, according to an expert, who agreed that it should not diminish acts of heroism.

Matt's Chat

I can see the Ted Rall cartoon already...and I don't even want to contemplate the ridiculous crap that is going to be on the Democratic Underground. Pat Tillman deserves better than what those idiots will smear him with...

Franks is absolutely right when he said that this doesn't take anything away from Tillman's heroics. Tillman was given a difficult job; he performed those duties with distinction. Without question, Tillman was a true patriot and a man worthy of the title role model.

Friday, May 28, 2004

Quote Time

From Ohioans for Bush/Cheney:

Sara R. of Pickerington, OH gets the credit for finding this...

Who said the following and what is the next line?
It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great
nation was founded not by religionists but by Christians, not on
religion but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. We shall not fight
alone. God presides over the destinies of nations. The battle is
not to the strong alone. Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to
be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty
God!

The Answer:

Patrick Henry concluded with:
"Give me liberty or give me death!"

Matt's Chat

Fellow Buckeyes, go join this fine group of folks who want to get the President re-elected.

Holy $%^&

From Yahoo News:
Pope John Paul II warned several U.S. bishops Friday that American society is in danger of turning against spirituality in favor of materialistic desires, giving way to a "soulless vision of life."
A "soulless vision of life"? Hmm...interesting assessment, Holy Father. Could it be we can't trust our priests with our children because we don't know who the next deviant priest is going to be? Could it be that when all one sees of the religious leadership is arrogance, one's view would be tainted? And you think you've got a solution for it? This ought to be good...

To fight this, the pontiff argued, the U.S. church must study contemporary culture to find a way to appeal to youths. He made his remarks to bishops from Indianapolis, Chicago and Milwaukee who were making a periodic visit to the Vatican.
How about this, pontiff: to fight this priests should not be sexual predators. And the Church administration shouldn't hide these guys and shun those who have been their victims. How about studying that?

The American church "is called to respond to the profound religious needs and aspirations of a society increasingly in danger of forgetting its spiritual roots and yielding to a purely materialistic and soulless vision of the world," John Paul said.
The American church should be called to clean the House of God before it starts spouting off about American culture. Somebody important once said, "Let he without sin cast the first stone" Oh, that was Jesus Christ wasn't it?

"Taking up this challenge, however, will require a realistic and comprehensive reading of the 'signs of the times,' in order to develop a persuasive presentation of the Catholic faith and prepare young people especially to dialogue with their contemporaries about the Christian message and its relevance to the building of a more just, humane and peaceful world."
I imagine this will be tough to do when the congregation has little faith in the leadership...

John Paul added: "An effective proclamation of the Gospel in contemporary Western society will need to confront directly the widespread spirit of agnosticism and relativism which has cast doubt on reason's ability to know the truth, which alone satisfies the human heart's restless quest for meaning."
JP, don't even talk to me about moral relativism while your bishops continue to shield priests who molest children. The hypocrisy and utter lack of humility is staggering. An effective proclamation of the Gospel starts with having the moral courage to do what is right. The Church will never be right until it acknowledges its crimes and takes appropriate action. Lecturing Americans isn't a good place to start...

God Bless America


Cosby Said the Darnedest Thing

More comments reported by the Washington Times:
"People used to be ashamed," he said.
These days, he said, "a woman has eight children with eight different 'husbands,' or men or whatever you call them now."

Here is some cross-examination courtesy of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel via Atlanta Daily World:
Kane wrote, "He's not a poor Black mother raising children in the inner city, so he has no idea how difficult that is in 2004 America. And if the TV star really wants to pass moral judgments on poor black women, ahem, Mr. Cosby, there is a little matter of you having an out-of-wedlock child yourself."

After reading the column, Cosby telephoned Kane. The columnist said that in an hour-long discussion, Cosby explained that he did not intend to smear all poor Blacks.

"I didn't say all black people from the lower classes were to blame," Kane said Cosby told him. "But I said that when you have a 50 percent graduation rate, and some people can't put two sentences together, and can't write or spell...you've got people who have put themselves on a track to failure."

WMD Coverage

We are still getting a lot of folks looking for Cosby commentary...Mark's Remarks can be found here.

War on Terror Update

From WorldNetDaily:
Officials: Bin Laden not running al-Qaida

Pakistani officials say al-Qaida is becoming more decentralized and its top leader, Osama bin Laden, may not be running the organization, reports Geostrategy-Direct, the global intelligence news service.

Instead, there is growing evidence al-Qaida No. 2 leader Ayman al-Zawahiri may be in charge of the terrorist network.

The officials also said Abu Musab al- Zarqawi, the Jordanian-based al-Qaida associate, is emerging as a new leader of the group.

This is CNN:
U.S. indicts British Muslim cleric

Abu Hamza al-Masri, a radical Muslim cleric linked to Zacarias Moussaoui and shoe bomber Richard Reid, was arrested Thursday in London and accused in a U.S. indictment of trying to establish a terrorist training camp in Oregon, U.S. officials said.

"We are actively seeking Hamza's extradition from Great Britain to face justice in our courts on these serious charges," U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft told reporters in New York.

In London, a British judge ordered Abu Hamza held without bail after his arrest Thursday and scheduled an extradition hearing for July 23.

From the Federal Bureau of Investigations:
Be On The Look Out

On May 26, Director Mueller and Attorney General Ashcroft held a press conference to call renewed attention to 7 individuals we believe pose a real and present danger to U.S. interests around the world--perhaps most especially this summer and fall, a time of high profile public events that may well serve as a lightning rod to terrorist attacks.

Director Mueller spoke frankly about the heightened threat to U.S. interests during these months, and equally frankly about strong FBI efforts to prevent attacks. "This summer and fall our nation will celebrate a number of events that serve as powerful symbols of our free and democratic society." he said. "Unfortunately, the same events that fill most of us with hope and pride are seen by terrorists as prime vehicles for sowing fear and chaos."

"We need the support of the American people," he said. [Pictures of seven Islamofascists that the FBI is looking for are on the website. - MATT]

Matt's Chat

Just a reminder: WE ARE STILL WINNING. We must stay focused and vigilent, but we must also continue to be Americans.

Mikey and Nick Berg

From the Toronto Star:
Filmmaker Michael Moore, whose incendiary new documentary criticizes President Bush's handling of the war, says he has unused footage of Nicholas Berg, the American civilian later beheaded in Iraq.

The footage, of an interview with Berg, "is approximately 20 minutes long. We are not releasing it to the media," Moore said in a statement. "It is not in the film. We are dealing privately with the family.''

Neither Moore nor his representatives would describe the nature or contents of the interview with Berg, who held staunch pro-war views.

Matt's Chat

I highlighted the reason why the interview got cut from the film.

Mikey "Miserable Failure" Moore is going to exploit the death of Nick Berg now. Is anyone surprised by this? I'm not. The man knows no decency.

Open Thread Friday

From the TIB Network:
Hey! We made it through another week! Congrats everybody!

I'm a little busy this morning, but should start the blogging routine shortly.

Have at it in the comments section... I'll update this post with the "Around the Blogosphere" stuff.

- Matt


9:00AM Update

Claudia Rosett has your UNSCAM update...the investigation is getting stalled. Again. And the danger level to those looking in to it is increasing.

Glenn points us to this TechCentralStation article about how Gen X missed out on cartoon violence and how it shows. This quote says it all:
"Super Friends," they called them, instead of the Justice League. The difference tells you everything you need to know about the seventies.
I know I feel cheated. Although this quote says a lot too:
Federal regulators, rather than nervous trial attorneys, wussified Saturday morning TV in the early seventies. Uncle Sam made our cartoons insipid, in the hope that a nice stiff dose of cultural chloroform would deaden our proto-male violent tendencies and transform us all into prissy poindexters who would eat our vegetables, sit still in our seats, and eventually vote for French-speaking politicians.
While we're on TCS, here's an article about Star Trek you might like.

Glenn must be right in front of me, because now he's recommending Lilek's today too...and so am I. Look out Glenn, I'm passing on the left...

10:00AM Update

Tim of Perry on Politics points out (with visual aids) more of John Kerry's arrogance. One of his commenters has an important point:
Shouldn't someone point out to the Senator that because he appointed himself President, the Constitution mandates that he must resign from the senate.
Kerry is dissing the electorate again...still...whatever... This country has ONE president and his name is BUSH.

DGCI has a fascinating post about a soldier that was killed after being captured by Iraqis from Jessica Lynch's group.

Thursday, May 27, 2004

Misunderestimated

From the TIB Sickbed:

Misunderestimated is the newest book by White House Correspondent Bill Sammon. It details the Bush Presidency after 9/11, and through March 20,2004. Mr. Sammon has unprecedented access and takes us inside some of the amazing historical events during President Bush's watch, including the secret Air Force One trip to Baghdad on Thanksgiving, and the moves to go to war with Iraq. It is an outstanding read and provides a very fair look at the Bush Administration, with key interviews and quotes from the major players.

What is really interesting, is the indictment of the Press by Sammon, one of their own, for lying and refusing to admit their lies about both the Afghan War and the Iraq War. Mr. Sammon gives specific examples of the media wanting to "sex up" stories and then blaming the Bush Admin. when the media lies were revealed to be untrue. Case in point-Jessica Lynch. It was a pair of uberfeminist reporters who created the super GI Jane image of Lynch, not the Pentagon. Why? Because they wanted to support women in combat, so they erroneously reported that Lynch was firing machine guns and gritting teeth while being wounded. When Lynch's own story did not go with this falsehood, did the reporters admit their mistake? Nope, they claimed the Bush Admin was using Lynch as a hero for goodwill for the war! Huh? The Bush Admin poo-pooed all the uber-Lynch stories. Yet, the press refuses to take the blame. This book is an outstanding read, not only for taking you inside the White House during key events, but also the true story about how the Press has lied about this war for its own agenda from one of their own. I would suggest to Matt to put it on our favorites list and maybe highlight it with a picture. Now I will go back to my convalescence.

-Mark



Buy it from Amazon and support WMD and the TIB Network:


Trackbacks

Interested Participant linked to this post.

Around the Blogosphere

'Cops' Coming to Cincinnati

Rob Bernard has the story and plenty of good commentary.

Molon Labe

Raging Dave from Four Right Wing Wackos is selling some stickers...
From the ancient Greek, they are the reply of the Spartan General-King Leonidas to Xerxes, the Persian Emperor who came with 600,000 of the fiercest fighting troops in the world to conquer and invade little Greece, then the center and birthplace of civilization as we know it. When Xerxes offered to spare the lives of Leonidas, his 300 personal bodyguards and a handful of Thebans and others who volunteered to defend their country, if they would lay down their arms, Leonidas shouted these two words back.

Molon Labe! (mo-lone lah-veh)

So, in that spirit, I offer Molon Labe bumper stickers, a handy way of telling all the gun-grabbing people in America just what you think. A black oval, 4.25in by 2.75in, with white lettering.

Know Thy Enemy: Fun Facts About Al Gore

Frank J. from IMAO is in his usual form...

ScrappleFace

Scott Ott does it again:
"His injuries remind me of my own three Purple Hearts earned during the Vietnam war," Mr. Kerry added.
Now, go read the set up...

That's it for now...maybe I'll post some more later...

Noon Update:

No Child Left Behind

Tyler of Red Line Rants has the goods on this widely misunderstood piece of legislation.

GORE

From Yahoo News:
Raising his voice to a yell in a speech at New York University, Gore said: "How dare they subject us to such dishonor and disgrace! How dare they drag the good name of the United States of America through the mud of Saddam Hussein's torture prison!"

The Democratic former vice president said the situation in Iraq is spinning out of control.

"I am calling today for Republicans as well as Democrats to join me in asking for the immediate resignations of those immediately below George Bush and Dick Cheney, who are most responsible for creating the catastrophe we are facing in Iraq," Gore said, drawing strong applause from the partisan crowd.

"Donald Rumsfeld ought to resign immediately!" Gore bellowed. "Our nation is at risk every single day Rumsfeld remains as secretary of defense. We need someone with good judgment and common sense."

Rice "ought to resign immediately. She has badly mishandled the coordination of national security policy. This is a disaster for our country," he said.

"It came from twisted values and atrocious policies at the highest levels of our government," he said.

The former presidential candidate was gentler on Tenet, a Clinton administration appointee, describing him as a friend and "honorable man" who should still leave his position for intelligence failures.

Matt's Chat

If this isn't aiding the enemy, I don't know what is... I'm all for freedom of speech, but like most of our freedoms, speech has limits too. This goes too far. It is slander and isn't helping the Democratic cause at all. Not that I care...

Speaking of dishonor and disgrace...the Clinton/Gore administration made a mockery of the presidency and diminished our role in the world. As the RNC Spokesman, Jim Dyke, said Al Gore doesn't understand the nature of terrorism. We have to take this fight to them otherwise we'll be fingting in Boston instead of Baghdad; Fairfield, OH instead of Fallujah. Uber-liberals like Al Gore don't understand the strategy of taking the fight to the enemy and they never will. That is why they are dangerous to our national security.

Al Gore should know better than to blame the administration for the acts of a very few soldiers. Abu Gharib was a black eye for us; but unlike Saddam's torturers, these guys will be punished instead of promoted and if you don't think that has value, you just don't get it.

Speaking of resignations, when is John Kerry going to resign from the Senate? He has been collecting a paycheck while not doing his job. As of May 23, Kerry has only worked three days in the Senate casting a grand total of 14 out of 103 votes. If that isn't dereliction of duty... Back in '96, Bob Dole resigned from the Senate so that he could focus on his losing bid to the White House against President Clinton. It was the right thing to do and it showed confidence (however misplaced) that Dole wanted to win. Why won't Kerry do the same? Because he wants to be able to punt and keep some power when he loses.

9:20AM Update

I forgot something very, very important.

Al Gore...

Wait for it...

Shut the pie hole.

Matt's Chat

From the TIB Network:
I've noticed that the big trend this week is folks looking for commentary about Bill Cosby's remarks. Mark's Remarks can be found here.

Speaking of Mark, he isn't feeling well and should be taking a couple of says off from the blog...not sure he will actually do it though, so we'll see.

As reported earlier in the news crawler above, the TIB gang met up with the SOC Entertainment folks at the MVCC studio. The studio is smaller than what we are used to at DATV, but I think our production values will go up with better equipment. We will be shooting "filler" material for the "Best of" show on 6/5 and we go Live and Direct from MVCC on 6/19. We are really looking forward to getting started out there.

SOC Entertainment reports that WMDtv sold its first DVD yesterday.

We're still working on the CrushKerry video spots, but are having some problems with the transfer. I haven't given up on it though...they are really good ads.

It is looking like a fairly slow news day so far...so have at it in the comments section...

- Matt


Wednesday, May 26, 2004

Something Good

From the Air Force Link via Defend America:
More than 600 rocket-propelled grenade launchers collected by coalition forces throughout southern Iraq, were recently destroyed by Airmen of the 407th Expeditionary Civil Engineer Squadron here.

Normally destroyed using explosives, this amount of weapons required too much.
...
After some experiments with a welding torch, structural craftsmen determined the optimum point for demilitarizing the launchers for the EOD flight.

The craftsmen made a work table to hold the launchers while they were torched.

After the weapons were rendered useless, they were buried.

Matt's Chat

I just thought it might be a nice to talk about something good happening in Iraq. Well done, fellas!

A Good Question

From Slant Point
With a new Iraqi government in place after June 30, and all the focus on the role of our military, I have one question no one seems to address. What of the media? Will any rules change regarding visas, and will any freedoms or restrictions be applied to the press?

Matt's Chat

That is a good question. I sent a note to the CPA to find out.

2:20PM Update

I received a reply from Captain (Army) Swan from the Multinational Force-Iraq Press Center saying that he would run it by the CPA. Sounds like we're getting somewhere!

DimmiWatch

From NewsMax:
Clarke Testimony Discredits Moore's 'Fahrenheit 911'
It's a good thing for Bush-bashing conspiracy filmmaker Michael Moore that the folks who run the Cannes Film Festival weren't paying much attention to the 9/11 Commission hearings earlier this year.

Otherwise they might have figured out that the central premise of Moore's film "Fahrenheit 911" - that President Bush let Osama bin Laden's relatives escape the U.S. and fly off to Saudi Arabia after the 9/11 attacks - has already been debunked.

What's more, the debunker in question, former White House terrorism czar Richard Clarke, has impeccable Bush-bashing credentials, authoring an entire book claiming that the Bush White House didn't do enough to prevent the 9/11 attacks.

But there's one allegation Clarke doesn't include in his anti-Bush bill of particulars - Moore's charge that he let the bin Ladens get away. Why not?

Because Clarke himself has already admitted to making that decision himself.

"I was making - or coordinating a lot of decisions on 9/11 in the days immediately after," he told the 9/11 Commission in late March, saying that the proposal to authorize the bin Laden fly-out was brought directly to him.

From the Boston Globe:
Doubts raised on protest site
Boston's designated area for protesters at the Democratic National Convention remains what one advocate described as a "cesspool" of dirt, construction equipment, and wires, leaving demonstration organizers questioning whether the 29,000-square-foot space will be ready when the convention opens in late July.

In a 90-minute walkthrough and discussion with Boston police officials, representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts and the state chapter of the National Lawyers Guild said that despite securing a bigger space and promises from city officials to provide a sound system, they still have a number of concerns.

"It's hard to fathom an area in such incredible disarray could possibly be blacktopped and ready to go before the convention," said Carol Rose, executive director of the state's ACLU. "Right now, it's a tangle of barbed wire, a cesspool of dirt and rock and garbage. Whether it comes from a theory into reality is the question."

From the Boston Globe:
Ted Kennedy's anti-American slander
TWO WEEKS ago Senator Ted Kennedy uttered what may turn out to be the single most disgusting remark made about the United States in the course of the Iraq War. The reaction to his slander - or rather, the lack of reaction - speaks volumes about the moral bankruptcy of the American left.

Speaking in the Senate on May 10, Kennedy had this to say about the Abu Ghraib prison scandal:

"On March 19, 2004, President Bush asked, 'Who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open?' Shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management - US management."
Read the full text of Kennedy's remarks

This was not a blurted, off-the-cuff comment - Kennedy was reading from a prepared text. It was not a shocked first reaction to the abuses at Abu Ghraib - the story had broken more than a week earlier. Incredibly, the senior senator from Massachusetts really was equating the disgraceful mistreatment of a few Iraqi prisoners by a few American troops with the unspeakable sadism, rape, and mass murder that had been routine under Saddam Hussein.

Kennedy's vile calumny should have triggered outrage. Here was the most prominent liberal politician in America accusing his own government of the very savagery it said it had gone to war to uproot. It was the worst kind of anti-American poison, and it was coming not from a crackpot with no following but from one of the most powerful Democrats in Congress. It should have unleashed an uproar.

It unleashed nothing.

Matt's Chat

Re: Moore - No surprise here. Mikey never bother to let the truth get in the way of a good smear. He is afterall, the Hamster King, and that's what they do. Michael "Miserable Failure" Moore wouldn't have it any other way...he'll be laughing all the way to the bank because he got away with lying to the American people yet again.

Re: Dem Convention Protest Site - Again, no surprise here. The Democrats only care about protests when THEY are doing the protesting.

Re: Teddy "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy's Statement and the lack of Intellectual Honesty on the Part of Liberals - Again, no surprise here. Liberals can't denounce their own. They insist that Republicans do it when they get crazy, but no way will the Democrats set this drunkard straight. And you know, I actually think it might do some good if a few liberals would do that. But they won't...it would be the right thing to do.

Mark's Remarks


re: Michael"Miserable Failure" Moore-- No surprise, that he would misconstrue facts, because he has done that in every single "documentary" he has done. These are not documentaries, they are propaganda positions pieces advocating the fat lazy masogynistic liberal's way of life. This guy is a disgrace to film making. He is such a hypocrite, talking about abuses by the wealthy, when his former staffers have gone on record saying this guy tortures them and abuses them psychologically. This guy talks about the rich needing to give some money, even while he lives sheltered away from the masses he claims to represent. Mr. Moore, kindly get on the treadmill and out of the ivory tower. As for laughing to the bank, I hope and pray the opposite happens. I hope this is FINALLY the film that gets Moore in trouble and ruins the charade of a reputation he has. The man and his points of view, while Constitutionally protected, are disturbing and disgusting.

re: Protest sites. How bout that? And lib hamsters everywhere talk about being so far away from the President with "free speech zones." Let me tell you, the protesters I saw (the handful or so) at the Bush rally in Cincy were not in degrading conditions. They had a nice sidewalk with a park bench across from the venue itself. Meanwhile, how do liberals feel about free speech? John Waffles Kerry, when asked about which leaders he had talked to, harassed a voter with "are you a Republican?" Howeird Dean, harassed a senior citizen when asked to stop the hatespeech in a respectful tone in a town meeting. These outbursts were not met with outrage by the supposed free speech loving Left, they were applauded and the crowd actually shouted down and threatened the people who spoke out.

Or, in September of 2002, the protesters at a Bush speech in Portland, who basically assaulted people who were coming to see the President, and harassed people just going into the hotel where the President was staying. These people blocked the path of people who made the free decision to go listen to the President, but where was the outrage at repression then? This just shows, many liberals stand for nothing more than the issue du jour of the moment. Look at environmentalists with alternative energy sources. We don't want coal/oil, but we don't want nukes either. Which is it, eh? No core, no foundation.

RE: Ted "Drunken Murderer" Kennedy-This man is a disgrace. He is a disgrace to his family, three of whom fought for freedom in WWII, one of whom lost his life in that war. He is a disgrace to the tradition of the two surviving brothers who fought in that war, JFK and RFK, who devoted their lives to freedom and reasoned debate. Ted Kennedy is also a disgrace to the US Senate. His behavior in the chambers and outside of them show him to be a drunken, secretary killing, sexual harassing idiotic fool. His latest statements show he does not care about the soldiers as he claims. He does not care about their morale. He does not care that his statements give aid and comfort to the enemy. In fact, all Drunken Murderer Kennedy cares about is getting a little extra press and trying to assassinate the character and leadership of President George W. Bush. Kennedy does not care about serving the people of Massachusetts, or about serving America. He is out for Ted Kennedy, and the other radical Lefties in Congress. He cares only about power. It says a lot about the attitude of the Dimocraps that they did not rush to condemn these comments; in fact, it shows their true colors. They hate our soldiers, too. Not because of what they are doing, but because it relfects well on the President. So, therefore, the soldiers must be evil because they are doing the job set forth for them by the President. For shame, really, that Democrats, in order to win, have to call our soldiers torturers, talk down the economy, and hope for more troop deaths. But, that is what they want. They don't care what they have to say, lie about, or do, they will do it just to try and get power. And the press, eagerly, lustily, goes along with them. Shameful, and disgraceful.

Summer Lovin': Terror Style

From Yahoo News:
U.S. officials have obtained new intelligence deemed highly credible indicating al-Qaida or other terrorists are in the United States and preparing to launch a major attack this summer, The Associated Press has learned.

The intelligence does not include a time, place or method of attack but is among the most disturbing received by the government since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, according to a senior federal counterterrorism official who spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity Tuesday.

Of most concern, the official said, is that terrorists may possess and use a chemical, biological or radiological weapon that could cause much more damage and casualties than a conventional bomb.
From My Way News:
Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director Robert Mueller are due to hold a 2 p.m. news conference at FBI headquarters on Wednesday to give details of the threat, the officials said.

One law enforcement official said Mueller and Ashcroft would announce an FBI "be on the lookout" bulletin and give specific information about individuals the FBI is seeking.

"It's more investigatory...there's nothing to do with infrastructure protection," the official said.

The Department of Homeland Security has no plans to raise the color-coded terror alert level, which is currently set at "yellow" for an "elevated" risk of attack, officials said.

Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has warned since April of potential threats in the United States over the summer, including during this week's Memorial Day holiday weekend.

Other events seen as vulnerable are the Group of Eight summit in Savannah, Georgia next month, the Fourth of July holiday and the Democratic and Republican national conventions toward the end of the summer.
From WorldNetDaily:
Al-Qaida has operatives currently within the United States who are preparing to mount a major terrorist attack on America this summer, according to government intelligence deemed to be highly credible.

The prediction was made public after a study by the International Institute of Strategic Studies revealed that despite the elimination of many top terror leaders – President Bush says two thirds of al-Qaida's leadership has been killed or captured – the terror network responsible for 9-11 still has a functioning leadership and over 18,000 potential terrorists in its global network, reports Fox News.

Matt's Chat

Please note that there is no actionable intelligence at this time. Remember that should something happen. Because there will be another 9/11 Commission and we'll go through all that crap again.

My advice: Don't change your plans. If you were going to go somewhere, go. If we give in to these fearmongering press, the terrorists win. And who wants that?

Mark's Remarks


While I tend to discount the fearmongering press liberal elite, still, this does give one some pause. Now, while I am NOT in favor of shutting up the doors and getting out the saranwrap and duct tape, I do think we need to be on guard. Notice anything suspicious? Report it immediately. And remember, there is not a shred of actionable intel here, as Matt said. All we are getting is something might happen. So, what do we do? Obviously there will be increased security at the Group of 8, as well as the D and R conventions. And we use the benefits of the Patriot Act to investigate and find out more information. Other than that, live your lives as you would. Bask in the glory of freedom, but be ever watchful. Don't forget that terror can strike, but at the same time, do not let it paralyze you in fear.

Tuesday, May 25, 2004

Sarin Re-Confirmed

From Yahoo News:
Comprehensive testing has confirmed the presence of the chemical weapon sarin in the remains of a roadside bomb discovered this month in Baghdad, a defense official said Tuesday.

The determination, made by a laboratory in the United States that the official would not identify, verifies what earlier, less-thorough field tests had found: the bomb was made from an artillery shell designed to disperse the deadly nerve agent on the battlefield.

The origin of the shell remains unclear, and finding that out is a priority for the U.S. military, the defense official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Some analysts worry the 155-millimeter artillery shell, found rigged as a bomb on May 15, may be part of a larger stockpile of Iraqi chemical weapons that insurgents can now use. But no more have turned up, and several military officials have said the shell may have been an older one that predated the 1991 Gulf War .

Matt's Chat

I just thought you all might like to know that it has been CONFIRMED that there were in fact WMDs in Iraq. Now watch the liberals move the goalpost to "stockpiles." By the way, the crickets are still chirping on this liberal challenge posted awhile back...

Mark's Remarks


OF course liberals will up the ante, Matt. They can never be wrong, even when facts prove that they are. Look at how the press covered the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Days into each war, we were in a quagmire like Vietnam. We were the oppressors, we were killing and firebombing civilians. When the facts come out and prove these bogus and damaging statements wrong, do we get page 1 apologies and corrections, a self-examiniation of the media? Heck no, we get "well, I guess we all missed the mark." Come on! The media liberal elite will never admit their mistakes, and they have been very damaging to soldier morale and to US presitge, but the media and liberal elite do not care, they do not care what happens to the nation, as long as they get GWB. Ridiculous, but sadly true.

Washington Times

Two stories from the Washington Times that are worthy of notice:
1)U.S. Says Iraq Attack Site Wasn't Wedding

2) Iraqi weapons pipeline probed

Matt's Chat

Recap/Synopsis: That was no wedding and the weapons are coming from Syria.

Question: What are we going to do about it?

Mark's Remarks


What? You mean the locals lied about the wedding to protect terrorists? That can't be! The only liars are Americans....Wait, sorry, I was channelling Al Franken for a moment there....

We have got to stand up and take Syria to account for this, and also to give the sad, pathetic, outmoded, useless world community a kick in the pants to jump on board. Terrorism is not just our problem, it is everybody's problem. Of course, with the exception of England, Europe is taking its usual recourse: let the US deal with it and then reap the rewards after they shed their blood. This is old hat with them: WWII, etc.

To our men and women, keep on fighting the good fight, and send more articles home telling of the vast good work you are doing. Bombard the papers back here with so many letters they have to print a few. Maybe then we can get more of the truth out, instead of the propaganda spewed by Dan Blather and Co.

Day After Tommorow is a Lot of Hot Air

From USA Today:
As a scientist, I bristle when lies dressed up as "science" are used to influence political discourse. The latest example is the global-warming disaster flick, The Day After Tomorrow.

This film is propaganda designed to shift the policy of this nation on climate change. At least that's what I take from producer Mark Gordon's comment that "part of the reason we made this movie" was to "raise consciousness about the environment."

Fox spokesman Jeffrey Godsick says, "The real power of the movie is to raise consciousness on the issue of (global warming)."

'Nuff said.

Matt's Chat

One is beginning to suspect that there might just be a Vast LEFT Wing Conspiracy at play here...

Remember this article when you see Al Gore at the premiere...

Mark's Remarks


I love the fact that a real scientist is speaking out against this film. Its premise is vastly outlandish, as well as the rapidity of events. This is a classic scare tactic, and one I hope the American people do not fall prey to. It is sad and pathetic that we have to use the entertainment venue of film to try to brainwash people, but hey, the Left loves that. They love the idea of state sponsored film and movies, just like their icons Lenin and Stalin had in the old days.

Flip Flopping Nothing New for Democrats

From the Union Leader
Some say Kerry's ambiguities are signs of courage. He went to war to fight for his country. And when Kerry came home, they say, he fought the war in support of what he thought was best for his country. Needless to say, many people disagree with this interpretation.

This will all be hashed out repeatedly between now and November. What I find more interesting is how familiar these complaints about Kerry seem to be.

Didn't we hear the same things about Bill Clinton, the original Democrat "Who Wanted to Have it Both Ways"?
...
And of course there was Al Gore. Now Gore wasn't really accused of holding conflicting ideas simultaneously, so much as constantly "reinventing himself." He'd been a pro-lifer, a pro-choicer, a social liberal, a social conservative, a hawk, a dove, a wonk, a quasi-hippy, a populist, an elitist, a New Democrat and an Old Democrat. Even such middle-of-the-road types as CNN's Bill Schneider wrote a column for National Journal titled "OK, Al, Who Are You Today?"

Clinton, Gore and Kerry are all very different men, with different histories. But I'm beginning to wonder if there's something about the Democratic Party or liberalism in general that results in picking these sorts of men as their standard-bearers.

Matt's Chat

Very interesting article by Jonah Goldberg. Go read the whole thing...

Mark's Remarks

They pick these men because they are the moral and backbone equivalent of Jell-O. They only care about maintaining power, they have no core. The Left likes that because they can use that. You take a piece of mindless clay and manipulate it to your ends. Voila! You have Dimocrap politics today!

OH's Democrat of the Year Update

From the Tribune-Chronicle:
Springer said the Bush administration has created a war against middle class Americans, with policies intended to shrink that middle class.

"For the first time in American history, we are not in the position in which we can honestly look at our children in the eye and say, 'Honey, you're going to have it better than us,'" Springer said. "I don't know if many middle class Americans today believe they can afford to send their children to a good four-year college."

Matt's Chat

I've mentioned this before, but I'll say it again: no administration has control over college tuition. Democrats know this, yet they continue to play class warfare. They are hoping to do young, impressionable voters what Bill Clinton managed to do to me: confuse me in to voting for him. Don't fall for this. And Springer should be ashamed of himself for engaging in this kind of rhetoric.

The American Dream is alive and well. The next generation will indeed have it better than we have it now...they are more conservative. Their kids will have it even better.

Mr. Springer, if you are so worried about college costs, why don't you get educated about the subject. It is the STATES that control most college budgets and the administrators who waste the money.

There are many things wrong with post-secondary education. The Bush administration isn't one of them.

Shut the pie hole, Dem-O'-Da-Year.

Mark's Remarks


Matt, it should hardly surprise you that this peddler of sleaze and smut would engage in such hateful rhetoric. And how is he to know about the middle class? Living in his large estate, behind gates and security guards, how is he to know what Americans are feeling? What, because he has some of the worst examples of trailer trash on his show, he thinks he has the pulse of America? Come on. Mr. Springer, you were a joke as a mayor, a joke as a reporter, and a joke as a political activist. You are such a huckster, it is sad and pathetic that this state would name you democrat of the year.

Mr. Springer, states control college tuition. States control that, and right now this state is being run by the most liberal Republican administration in the state's history. Mr. Taft is a crock as a Republican, and I hope he took those boos in Cincinnati to heart. Springer, instead of trying to play the class warfare game, why don't you establish scholarships to help defray the cost of college, you know, do some good work, instead of the trash you call a talk show?

The fact is, there are more college aid opportunities out there than ever before. While tuition increases, the amount of aid to students increases as well, and with low interest rates on loans, this helps defray costs further. Quit playing class and age warfare games, Jerry, and stick to real issues!

Frenchie Wants Arabs to have Nukes

From Europarl:
Madam President, the most surprising thing about our debate is our surprise, for Israel's expansionist policy is the inevitable and predictable result of the growing imbalance in the region, the stability for which we bear much of the responsibility. Firstly that is because since 1967 most of our states, with the notable exception of France, have continued to give the State of Israel – a state that is growing increasingly self-assured and domineering – the impression that it can violate international law and UN resolutions with impunity.

In reality, here as elsewhere we have followed Washington and persist in closing our eyes to the theocratic excesses of this religious state whose governments are under the thumb of fanatical parties and minorities that are just as bad as the other groups of religious fanatics in the region. That is why we should envisage imposing sanctions on Israel.

There is, however, another serious imbalance for which we are in part responsible, namely the imbalance of forces. I have no hesitation in saying that we must consider giving the Arab side a large enough force, including a large enough nuclear force, to persuade Israel that it cannot simply do whatever it wants. That is the policy my country pursued in the 1970s when it gave Iraq a nuclear force. We have now destroyed it. So we will carry on with our policy of imbalance and what is happening today is merely the annoying but inevitable result of our collective blindness and cowardice.

Matt's Chat

This is the danger of anti-Semitism gone amok... France wants to give nuclear weapons to countries who support blowing up school busses. Does anybody else think this is a good idea? I don't. And I put this in the pile of evidence that France is not an ally of the United States, but rather an enemy.

Mark's Remarks


France admits it gave nukes to Iraq in the 1970s. Who knows what they gave them under the table in the 1990s? Also, who in the heck are the French to talk about fanaticism? Remember the debacle that was the French Revolution? Remember the Reign of Terror? Who are these whining and arrogant synchopants to charge fanaticism, especially when their nation has one of the biggest growing anti-Semite populations in the world. It is more evidence that the French are not friends of democracy, they are not friends of America. They are more and more looking like the enemy, a sad and pathetic country that has no prestige other than a large phallic symbol in its capital, trying to be a player one last time.

Sir Tommy

This is CNN:
The presentation of an honorary knighthood to the top U.S. military commander behind the invasion of Iraq, retired Gen. Tommy Franks, has provoked a row in Britain.

Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon will present Franks with the honorary Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire Tuesday in a private ceremony, a spokesman for Britain's Ministry of Defence told CNN.

The honorary KBE (Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire) is equivalent in ranks to British knights like Sir Richard Branson, Sir Paul McCartney and Sir Elton John.

But Franks will not be able to call himself Sir Tommy because he is not a British citizen.

Alice Mahon, a leading anti-war rebel in Prime Minister Tony Blair's Labour Party, called the award "the ultimate in bad taste."

"This is not a time to be honoring American military figures when we are being confronted almost daily with the most sickening images of abuse of Iraqis," she told the Daily Mirror newspaper.

The award is not without precedent, as an honorary KBE was given to the two U.S. military architects of the Gulf War in 1990, then-Gen. Colin Powell and Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf.

Other U.S. citizens to receive an honorary KBE include Bob Hope, Sidney Poitier, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Ed Murrow, John Paul Getty II and the BBC's Alistair Cooke -- the "British" broadcaster who renounced his UK citizenship during World War II.

More recently the award -- recommended by Britain's foreign secretary and conferred by Queen Elizabeth II -- was collected by film director Stephen Spielberg and Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

Matt's Chat

A well deserved award for a most deserving man. Bravo, General!

Mark's Remarks


And, Ms. Radical member of Parliament, what do you think about the rape of mothers in Africa, some as young as 13, by UN peacekeepers? What did you think about the rape and torture under Saddam? Ma'am, General Franks ended the rape and torture rooms of Saddam, and to paint the events at Abu Ghraib in the same light as what is being done by UN peacekeepers and what was done by Saddam is sickening in its stupidity. You obviously have no sense of context or even sanity if you rate Abu Gharib and Saddam's tortures on the same level. You are a disgrace to your office, for standing in the way of honoring a noble man who exemplifies courage and leadership. As you British say, p*$$ off!

Unhinged

From MSNBC:
Michael Moore’s controversial documentary may get Disney boycotted after all.

Conservatives threatened to boycott the Mouse House last year when it was revealed that the movie company’s subsidiary Miramax was funding the Bush-bashing film, “Fahrenheit 9/11.” Now that Disney is refusing to let Miramax distribute the Palm D’or winning flick, liberals are organizing a boycott against it.

“You are censoring one of the most important filmmakers in America,” reads a petition being circulated by Democrats.com and signed by more than 20,000 people. “This is unacceptable in a democracy. As consumers, we are not powerless. We will protest with our wallets — by boycotting Disney products until you agree to distribute Fahrenheit 9/11.” They’re saying they won’t buy anything produced by Disney, including its films, theme parks, toys, and TV networks.

“It’s a free country,” Disney spokeswoman Zenia Mucha tells The Scoop. “We have a right to decline distribution. They have a right to do whatever they think is in their interest.”

Matt's Chat

Michael "Miserable Failure" is getting exactly what he wants: more publicity and more buzz. This is why I advocated ignoring this punk in the first place.

Information about a real documentary being released this year, can be found here. "The story of a rebel who took on Mike." Support the making of this film by purchasing cool, swag gear here.

Mark's Remarks


Where in the blue blazes was all this outrage over censorship when Mel Gibson was trying to find a distributor for "The Passion of the Christ?" Where was the liberal outrage over freedom of expression being impinged then? What blatant hypocrisy, what a crock of crap! If Mr. Moore is so convinced that this film is so monumental, let him put up some of his millions and distribute it himself...oh wait, he is a liberal, they can't take responsibility for themselves or do anything on their own, they have to have others do it for them....Silly me!

President Speaks

From CBS News:
President Bush is urging Americans and Iraqis alike to follow what he envisions is a path toward a stable, peaceful Iraq. But events out of his control could frustrate his five-step plan in coming weeks, and he acknowledges "difficult days ahead."

The president, speaking at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pa., offered no exit strategy for bringing 138,000 American soldiers home, pledging instead to send more, if necessary.

"Terrorists will not determine the future of Iraq," Bush declared.

Matt's Chat

Mark and I did not catch the speech live (and I still have not seen it) due to our meeting with the production staff, but it looks like it was a fairly good speech (on message).

This was the "first of a series" of speeches, so I'm not surprised that there were some things missing from the speech, most notably an exit strategy. Although, I think the exit strategy has been clear from the beginning: Iraq will be stable and have democracy; then, we leave. We really don't need to know more than that. There is absolutely no sense in giving our enemy any additional information. There really isn't.

Key point: we are there to lend strength to a friend, we will not be there forever.
"America's task in Iraq is not only to defeat an enemy, it is to give strength to a friend — a free, representative government that serves its people and fights on their behalf, and the sooner this goal is achieved, the sooner our job will be done," Mr. Bush said.
Have we grown so cynical so as to not believe what our leaders tell us? Did Clinton totally destroy what little faith we have in the presidency? Have we, as a nation, become so partisan that we can't support America as one voice? Why does John Kerry continue to slap our allies in the Coalition of the Willing?
"That's going to require the president to genuinely reach out to our allies so the United States doesn't have to continue to go it alone and to create the stability necessary to allow the people of Iraq to move forward," said Kerry, who himself has been faulted for failing to offer a concrete, alternative Iraq policy.
I believe in America. I believe in this President. I believe what America has done is right and just.

I do not believe those who wish to tear us down from within.

Mark's Remarks


Matt, the coverage is wrong. The President did offer an exit strategy. He offered a five step plan of how things are going to go. When those five conditions are met, then we exit. Looking at the speech, I am ashamed of the American media who did not cover the speech live. Isn't it sad that they would care more for showing you celebrity makeovers or people eating cockroaches than they would an important and critical policy address of the President? Is that what America has become? Have we become so pompous and lazy back here at home that we would rather have unfettered access to such simpleminded programming rather than inform ourselves about the important issues of the day? If that is the case, then the America we leave to the future may not be an America at all.

Yet Another UN Scandal

From the Indpendent (UK):
Teenage rape victims fleeing war in the Democratic Republic of Congo are being sexually exploited by the United Nations peace-keeping troops sent to the stop their suffering.

The Independent has found that mothers as young as 13 - the victims of multiple rape by militiamen - can only secure enough food to survive in the sprawling refugee camp by routinely sleeping with UN peace-keepers.

Testimony from girls and aid workers in the Internally Displaced People (IDP) camp in Bunia, in the north-east corner of Congo, claims that every night teenage girls crawl through a wire fence to an adjoining UN compound to sell their bodies to Moroccan and Uruguayan soldiers.

The trade, which according to one victim results in a banana or a cake to feed to her infant son, is taking place despite a pledge by the UN to adopt a "zero tolerance" attitude to cases of sexual misconduct by those representing the organisation.

Matt's Chat

I'm quite sure that on tonight's news, we'll hear Nancy "Botox" Pelosi and Teddy "Chappaquiddick" Kennedy denounce this. But I won't hold my breath.

Why won't American media cover UN scandals? Britain doesn't seem to have a problem doing so...

Mark's Remarks


This goes far beyond Abu Gharib in my opinion. Making mothers sell their bodies to UN peacekeepers simply to feed their children? Is this what the UN endorses? Where is the outrage over this? Where is the demands for full accountability? After all, we pay for this crap the UN is doing, as we are the largest contributor to the waste of space that is the UN. Of course, the Liberal Press cannot challenge the UN, for it is their ideal....A world government which does nothing but posture, which only issues warnings but never enforces, a world government which is, in many ways, a joke.

Think about it...this is who John Waffles Kerry and the Dimocraps want to turn our national security over to. They allow their soldiers to rape 13 year olds, and to rape children. Yet no one says or does anything about it. Think about that before you vote for John Kerry and his leftist pals.

Monday, May 24, 2004

Carnival of the Bush Bloggers


From the TIB Network:
This week's selections are up! And we're in!

WELCOME BLOGS FOR BUSH READERS & THANKS FOR DROPPING BY!


Those "Non-Partisan" A.C.T. Folks

From Montgomery County Ohio for Bush
y doorbell rang an hour or so ago. I looked out and saw a man in a t-shirt with some sort of American Flag logo on it. I opened the door and stepped outside and immediately noted that the logo was an A.C.T. logo. Let the games begin. The man asks for me by name and, as he looks at the PDA on his clipboard, tells me that he has me down as a registered voter. "Registered Republican," I say. Already flustered, he juts a folded up piece of paper at me and says he's conducting a non-partisan survey for A.C.T. and would I mind answering. "Give it your best shot." He asks which two issues are most important to me: unemployment, the economy, healthcare, social security, education, or outsourcing. "Uhh ... what other choices do I have?" He says he will also ask me if I'm for or against the war in Iraq. "For. Can you give me the choices for the issues again, please?" Same tired old list, as he refuses to make any semblance of eye contact and taps away on his PDA. "What about national security, terrorism or high taxes?" They aren't on his list, he says, as he motions to his PDA. "Can you write in 'Terrorism' and 'National Security' for me?" No, he can't do that, would I like to hear my choices again. "I don't particularly think any of those things are the business of the government." He asks if I'm concerned about unemployment. "Not really, I've got a job, and the only person I know of working age who doesn't have a full time job doesn't want one right now." He tells me he's unemployed. "You look tired. How long have you been at this today?" All day, he says. "Try job hunting." At that, I closed the door and went inside.

Oh, and by the way. His "non-partisan handout? It blames President Bush and Governor Taft for a bad economy. Do these people watch the news, or do they just attend protests and knock on doors? President Bush's tax cuts have fixed the Clinton Economy.

Kerry Supporters: Is this the best you have to offer?

Matt's Chat

Eric pretty much nails it. I would have to say that I actually do place some blame on Gov. Taft for Ohio's "economic troubles," but I don't think the A.C.T. folks would agree with my thinking: Taft needed to reduce taxes and failed to do so. John Kerry wants to raise taxes. it is the only way he'll be able to pay for all those programs he's been promising. Unless of course, he's, you know, lying...

Noon Update:

Brian over at Miami Valley Conservative Alliance has some interesting viewpoints on the locals that call in to our show:
The folks in Dayton represent the uneducated electorate Neil Boortz often refers. They will never understand the issues until they turn off the television and take an economics course. This does mean that the campaign is wasting its time going after these voters; they should. The problem faced in Dayton is that the Democratic mantra has been drummed into the resident’s mind so well and often by the Dayton school system and the news media, coupled with their own ignorance, they will never understand how little the President effects the Ohio economy. They will never understand that Ohio’s problems result from over taxation, too many state and county social programs, and a growing atmosphere that drives businesses away, and a Governor and General Assembly that are Republicans in name only.

Mark's Remarks


Wow, these ACT folks are using unemployed people to hand out propaganda? Are they being paid? Do they read the crap they distribute?

Matt hits it on the head. No one teaches basic economics anymore, instead we are automatically exposed in schools to the liberal economic idea that government is responsible for everything. When I taught basic economic ideas of supply and demand in my classroom, and actually went through how little governments influence things, the students were shocked. They had always heard governments do everything. Sad and pathetic, that some of my fellow teachers are more concerned about indoctrination than in teaching children about the real world and preparing them for living in it. Instead of helping to prepare them to diagnose the problem (Bob Tax Taft and his fellow RINOs in GA), instead they are taught to blame Bush, even though the Prez has little to do with factories locating or evacuating Ohio. All just to indoctrinate the idea of central control of resources, so better to get them to be advocates for centrallized economic policies, the liberal goal of communism.

Green Hero Endorses Nuke Power

From the Independent (UK):
Global warming is now advancing so swiftly that only a massive expansion of nuclear power as the world's main energy source can prevent it overwhelming civilisation, the scientist and celebrated Green guru, James Lovelock, says.

His call will cause huge disquiet for the environmental movement. It has long considered the 84-year-old radical thinker among its greatest heroes, and sees climate change as the most important issue facing the world, but it has always regarded opposition to nuclear power as an article of faith. Last night the leaders of both Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth rejected his call.

Matt's Chat

That settles it for me...let's build 'em! Every town should have one...

Actually, every town should already have had one...

Mark's Remarks


Just love how these idiots stick together....not! Greenpeace and Co. are nothing more than egomaniacs who want to have the SUVs and such while no one else does. They are so elitist they will not listen to one of their own, who advocates an alternative fuel source for power....and here I thought oil was the enemy....

Major Terror Threat Uncovered

From The Sun (UK):
MADONNA has axed three gigs in Israel — after terrorists threatened to kill her and her kids.

The singer was terrified by a blitz of poison-pen letters.

Madge “freaked out” when she learned of a terrorist plot to kill her two young children if she performed in Israel.

She first planned to defy the extremists but cancelled after the unnamed Palestinian group mentioned details about Lourdes, seven, and three-year-old Rocco in a series of threatening letters.

Matt's Chat

She's so brave... Wait a minute...wasn't Madonna a Wes Clark supporter? She doesn't like Bush. What's THIS all about? What? Terrorists don't care who's in charge, they just want to kill Americans? Hmm...color me surprised. The media has been spinning this whole thing as an anti-Bush thing. Liberals keep saying it has something to do with Iraq. The evidence doesn't seem to support either. So what's going on here?

Mark's Remarks


Maybe the Material Girl will wake up and realize that we have to get these animals before they get us. Of course, we are talking about the star of Shanghai Surprise, so don't hold your breath.

CNN Covers Bush Fall

This is CNN:
President Bush fell off his bicycle Saturday while riding on his ranch, according to White House spokesman Trent Duffy.

Bush, who was accompanied on his bike ride by his doctor, Richard Tubb, a military agent and a member of the Secret Service, fell about 16 miles into a 17-mile ride.

Bush suffered minor abrasions to his chin, upper lip, nose, right hand and both knees, but was able to ride back home, Duffy said.

Matt's Chat

After a couple of Google searces, I was unsuccessful finding any CNN coverage of John Kerry's bike accident or his skiing accident. Is the next Communist News Network meme that the President is a clutz?

Also note, that the President didn't blame the Secret Service for his accident. These things happen...

But isn't it odd how CNN didn't cover John Kerry's spills...

11:05 Update:

John Kerry has a pithy comment...
"Kerry told reporters in front of cameras, 'Did the training wheels fall off?' " Mr. Drudge reported on his Web site, www.drudgereport.com.

Interviewed by The Washington Times yesterday, Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter would say only that the words Mr. Drudge reported were "off the record."

Mr. Drudge said the debate among reporters over the on-camera "training wheels" remark has been "whether to treat it as on or off the record."

In comments reported by the Associated Press, Mr. Kerry said, "I hope he's OK. I didn't know the president rode a bike."
Where is this guy's STAFF? They really need to sit him down and remind him that he's running for President. You can't hardly say that the Republican Attack Squadtm is out there smearing you when, you know, you're smearing the President.

Mark's Remarks


John Kerry revealed again that not only does he have no backbone, he has no class. Training wheels indeed. So, where were your training skiis when you rammed that Secret Service agent? Where were your training wheels when you fell on your bike? Mr. Kerry, you demonstrate daily why you lack the necessary qualities to be dogcatcher, much less President of these Great United States of America.

Freedom of the Press

From Instapundit
Press freedom as we know it today is a rather recent innovation. The First Amendment didn't really do much work until just before World War Two. In World War One, people were convicted of sedition for publishing things that wouldn't raise an eyebrow today. Libel suits were easier, and in general the press enjoyed much less of a special status. (For a good history, especially of the World War One and Civil War eras, read this article by Geoffrey Stone).

And it wasn't really until the 1960s and 1970s, after cases like Brandenburg v. Ohio, and the Pentagon Papers case, that what we think of as press freedom today came into existence.

So the question is, is that a coincidence -- did the United States just happen to make progress in free expression over that period -- or is that expansion of press freedom tied to the fact that regard for the press, and in particular its fairness and objectivity, was (rightly or wrongly) at unusually high levels by historical standards during those decades?

Matt's Chat

Oddly enough, I think the emergence of the press has to do with Vietnam and Watergate. Prior to that tumultuous period, Americans had faith in the government and their leaders. Americans believed in the American Dream and were optomistic about the future and our place in it.

And then John Kerry and his generation came. Suddenly, America wasn't good anymore. Our military were brutal child killers. Our leaders were crooked liars. And the American Dream became something of a nightmare. Free love, tune in, and peace out. Or whatever.

The media seemed more honest and trustworthy. Why? They hid their agenda better than the politicans.

Mark's Remarks


Freedom of the Press has run amok. It used to be there was some respect between reporters and those they covered. Salacious issues were left out, and we did not constantly hear: the public has a right to know. Granted, while I love the information age and the alternative media, the mainstream press has grown salacious in its coverage to try to keep people around who are turning away from their biased accounts. It used to be you just reported the events and the people decided. Now, the mainstream press puts blatant spin in their articles to further agendize the covering of the news. It is a shame, but sadly, people like Edward Murrow today would never make it because they were too objective, their objectivity would be called softness, even though I myself find refreshing the lack of an agenda in the reporting. Today, we have a bunch of mini WH Hearsts who are using pictures to produce tragedy, and it is sad and pathetic.

Friday, May 21, 2004

Give That Man a Jello(tm) Pudding Pop!

From WorldNetDaily and CJAD 800

Comedian Bill Cosby wants black Americans to follow the example of civil rights leaders in improving their neighbourhoods and reaching out for higher education.


"These people marched and were hit in the face with rocks to get an education and now we've got these knuckleheads walking around," he said Monday evening at an NAACP gala commemorating the anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision 50 years earlier.

"Take the neighbourhood back," Cosby said, chiding parents who do not take an active role in caring for their children.
"Ladies and gentlemen, the lower economic people are not holding up their end in this deal. These people are not parenting. They are buying things for kids – $500 sneakers for what? And won't spend $200 for 'Hooked on Phonics.'

He added: "They're standing on the corner and they can't speak English. I can't even talk the way these people talk: 'Why you ain't,' 'Where you is' ... And I blamed the kid until I heard the mother talk. And then I heard the father talk. ... Everybody knows it's important to speak English except these knuckleheads. ... You can't be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth!"

"These are not political criminals," he said. "These are people going around stealing Coca-Cola. People getting shot in the back of the head over a piece of pound cake and then we run out and we are outraged, [saying] 'The cops shouldn't have shot him.' What the hell was he doing with the pound cake in his hand?"

Mark's Remarks

Finally, someone else is realizing what is plaguing the black community. Kudos to Mr. Cosby for his courage in speaking the truth as he sees it in front of such a hostile crowd. Mr. Cosby has it right. The Left in the black community has hijacked worthy goals and turned it into entitleism and lack of drive, along with calling people who are merely thugs political prisoners. Mr. Cosby has shown great insight and determiniation in his own efforts to improve the black community, and he should not be brushed off as an "uncle Tom." Mr. Cosby is one of the success stories, and he needs to get that message of working hard out, instead of the rampant advocates of entitlements and 'where's mine' that seem to pervade nowadays.

Mr. Cosby, in my opinion, represents a growing group of African American folks who are sick and tired of the bastardization of their struggle by some in their community (namely the Jesse Jacksons, Kweasy Mfumes, Louis Farrakhans and the like) and are coming out against this self-inflicted suffering. More people of color should have the bravery of Mr. Cosby and come out and take a stand.